analyticsNEGOTIA
AI NEGOTIATION SIMULATOR

Don't just study negotiations. Practice them.

Realistic negotiations with AI characters. Choose strategy, lead the dialogue, decide under pressure — and get a personal debrief of every round.

Explore scenariosexplore
verifiedHarvard Method•
chat_bubbleSPIN questions•
tuneBATNA & pressure•
inventory_212+ real cases
record_voice_overSIMULATION: Contract price increase
In progressRound 3 of 10
PRESSUREHigh
TRUST INDEX68%
SPEECH TEMPO132 wpm
SESSION TIME08:42
MV
Maria VasilievaProcurement Director (Vendor)

"We've revised the contract terms due to a server architecture upgrade. The minimum base-rate increase we're willing to seriously consider is 15%."

Harvard • ProbingYou (Lead Negotiator)

"What exactly drove this increase given our current guaranteed volume? We expected the terms to hold on renewal."

YOU
MV
Maria Vasilievajust now

"The main reason is rising cross-border logistics and 24/7 Tier-3 support. However, if you lock volume for 2 years we're open to revisiting the rate."

lightbulbHidden interest found: contract term matters more than base rate (+8 to position strength)
SPIN PASS
Your goal: ≤ 7%Consensus now: ~10%Counterpart: 15%
MARKET REALITY

You can't learn to negotiate from a textbook alone.

01

Theory ≠ practice

Reading bestsellers won't reprogram your physiological reactions and stress when a real counterpart starts pushing openly or blocking the dialogue.

02

Mistakes are costly

Real commercial deals, funding rounds, and budget talks with the Board are no place for risky experiments.

03

Feedback is subjective

Colleagues and counterparts rarely tell the truth about your hidden concessions, weak arguments, or a prematurely revealed BATNA.

Executive preparing for negotiation
Real scenario
analyticsCase #04 • Executive Track

Preparing for the Board

"Real negotiations have no 10-minute pause to think. Either you sharpened your arguments in advance, or you accept someone else's terms."

Stakes: EnterpriseBATNA Required
shieldNEGOTIA creates a safe space for unlimited practice with an objective algorithmic audit of every round.
Zero-Risk Environment
TRAINING ARCHITECTURE

Four steps to your next real negotiation

01folder_open

Choose

A scenario from a structured catalog of business situations: procurement, salary review, key-client retention, or crisis audit.

12+ base contexts
02assignment

Prepare

Fix your target outcome, walk-away threshold, negotiation range (ZOPA), and best alternative (BATNA).

Interactive brief
03forum

Negotiate

Run the meeting by voice or text against an autonomous AI model that reacts to pressure, emotion, and the structure of your arguments.

Live Cognitive Flow
04insights

Debrief

Get an objective competency scorecard, a negotiation-profile radar, and a detailed audit of the key turning-point lines.

Harvard & SPIN metrics
COMPLEX CONFIGURATIONS

Every decision changes the negotiation

Real negotiations are rarely one-on-one. Face multiple AI participants with mutually exclusive interests.

Boardroom negotiation
High stakes • Multi-party round
groupsEnterprise software procurement committee

Three opposing views on budget, SLA, and migration terms. A conflict of interest between stakeholders.

CFO (Finance)Hard stance

"I won't increase the annual IT budget by a single dollar."

Hidden interest: quarterly cost-optimization bonus
CTO (Technology)Moderate risk

"Switching the current stack and vendor will halt sprints for at least 3 months."

Hidden interest: SLA stability and release continuity
VendorOpen to deal

"We can offer a flexible rate if we sign for 24 months."

Hidden interest: ARR forecast for the funding round
speedTable tension index:62/100 (Moderate)
handshakeCoalition balance:You + CTO vs CFO
Deal potential: 84%
THE TECHNOLOGY GAP

This isn't just an AI chat. It's a simulation.

chat

Regular AI chat

  • closePassively agrees or instantly caves at the first demand
  • closeNo hidden motives, emotions, inner doubts, or personal motivation
  • closeMakes concessions instantly with no counter-conditions or price locks
  • closeVague, abstract feedback with no methodological metrics or scoring
ENGINE CORE
psychology

NEGOTIA Engine

  • check_circleActive tactical resistance: argues, defends interests, and tests your limits
  • check_circleDynamic stress & trust model: the character closes under pressure and opens on mutual gain
  • check_circleHidden motives & BATNA: the character pursues internal company goals and knows its walk-away point
  • check_circleRigorous post-analysis: an audit against the Harvard principled-negotiation model and the SPIN framework
CORE FRAMEWORKS

Choose what you want to master

Train negotiations through proven global approaches — right inside a real simulation.

schoolHARVARD MODEL

Harvard Principled

Seek mutual gain, separate people from the problem, and focus on true interests instead of rigid positions.

InterestsOptionsCriteria
helpSPIN PROBING

SPIN Technique

Sequential situation, problem, implication, and need-payoff questions to surface hidden pains.

SituationProblemImplication
balanceWALK-AWAY POINT

BATNA Control

Assess the best alternative to a negotiated agreement, define the walk-away point, and hold the balance of power.

AlternativePowerBoundary
Recommended
hubHYBRID MODE

Combined Strategic

A full stress test: the Harvard value approach, deep SPIN probing, and BATNA defense.

All-in-One Framework
INTERACTION FORMATS

Choose how you negotiate

chat_bubble

Text chat

A thoughtful real-time dialogue. Weigh every phrase, use notes, and test arguments at a calm pace.

Ideal for: structured analysis and first steps
mic

Voice mode

Speak into the mic and train your intonation, confidence, tempo, and ability to parry objections without pauses.

Ideal for: prepping for video calls and live meetings
alt_route

Challenge (move choices)

Pick from 3–4 tactical responses under a ticking timer and instantly track the shift in negotiation balance.

Ideal for: quickly building pattern recognition
SESSION POST-ANALYTICS

You learn more than whether you won

NEGOTIA analyzes exactly how you led the dialogue, where you gave up initiative, and which levers you missed.

FINAL SCORE
84/100
Deal closed
Question quality91%
Active listening84%
Strategic line82%
BATNA defense88%
Argument density76%
Concession control68%
Terms: +6.8% base rate on a 2-year lock (target range achieved).
AI Debrief: dialogue breakdownRound 5 / Key moment
thumb_upWhat went well

You successfully surfaced the counterpart's real interest (contract term) and kept a constructive, calm tone even under aggressive bargaining.

warningWhat could improve

You made the first price concession before requesting counter-conditions on SLA guarantees and payment scheme.

near_meCritical turning point (Round 5)

In round 5 the counterpart mentioned the project term — the main value-exchange point you only partly used.

Recommended alternative line:

"If we extend the contract to 2 years, what counter-discount on the first service year will you commit to?"

Honest negotiation debrief
1-on-1 Debrief
NO CORPORATE FLUFF

A debrief that actually changes your negotiation pattern

In real life, partners rarely explain why a deal fell through. NEGOTIA impartially highlights every step: unjustified discounts, missed leverage, and moments you lost the initiative.

check_circleObjective metricspsychologyCognitive insights
REPLAY & ITERATE

Try again. But do it differently.

Restart the scenario from the same pivotal round, test a different tactic, and compare results in real time.

Attempt 171
arrow_forward
Attempt 284
arrow_forward
Attempt 391
CASE LIBRARY

Realistic scenarios for any context

CareerMedium difficulty

Salary raise

Defend your results before a conservative manager under strict payroll limits.

Counterpart: CPO8-12 min
ProcurementMedium difficulty

Vendor price increase

The vendor demands a 15% increase. Find counter-conditions and protect the contract economics.

Counterpart: Head of Sales10-15 min
SalesHigh difficulty

Key-client discount

An enterprise client threatens to leave for a competitor, demanding a 30% discount at fiscal year-end.

Counterpart: Procurement VP12-18 min
ManagementMedium difficulty

Team resource conflict

Two leads claim the same senior engineer for parallel critical releases.

Counterpart: Team Lead10 min
PartnershipHigh difficulty

Strategic partnership

A joint venture (JV): aligning ownership shares, IP, and veto rights.

Counterpart: Managing Director20 min
CrisisExpert difficulty

Rescuing a broken contract

A critical infrastructure failure caused client losses. Prevent a lawsuit and termination.

Counterpart: Chief Legal Officer15-25 min
PERSONAL SKILL PROFILE

Your negotiation style becomes visible over time

The system tracks concession dynamics, reaction speed under psychological pressure, and typical mistakes across dozens of sessions.

SIMULATIONS12
AVG SCORE78
BEST SCORE94
recommendRECOMMENDED FOCUS

Handling psychological pressure

In the last 3 rounds you gave up to 60% of the range under the counterpart's direct emotional pressure.

Recommended case: "Hard negotiation with a monopolist"
READY TO PRACTICE?

Your next negotiation can be your training ground

Test your skills and strategy in a safe simulation before you step into a real meeting with a key client or investor.

Explore scenarios